{"id":368504,"date":"2024-05-21T03:44:01","date_gmt":"2024-05-21T03:44:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/?p=368504"},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-29T21:00:00","slug":"","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/?p=368504","title":{"rendered":"<span>The Rule of Handling Tasks That Never Get Done<\/span>"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><!--[--><!--]--><\/div>\n<div id=\"post-content-body\">\n<div>\n<div class=\"article-formatted-body article-formatted-body article-formatted-body_version-2\">\n<div xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xhtml\">\n<figure class=\"full-width\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/habrastorage.org\/r\/w1560\/getpro\/habr\/upload_files\/741\/71d\/c50\/74171dc50aecbde7c242341cfc2c6c57.png\" width=\"1555\" height=\"1037\" data-src=\"https:\/\/habrastorage.org\/getpro\/habr\/upload_files\/741\/71d\/c50\/74171dc50aecbde7c242341cfc2c6c57.png\"\/><\/figure>\n<p>When managing tasks, there&#8217;s a simple principle to follow: if a task keeps getting postponed and something else always takes priority, it might be time to accept this fact and remove it. There&#8217;s no need to keep it lingering in the backlog or to keep shifting it from one sprint to another. If this happens, teams will start losing faith in the backlog as a current and relevant tool. They&#8217;ll stop trusting the set priorities if they constantly change and will come to you asking for the next task to work on.<\/p>\n<p>Just delete it. Don&#8217;t assign it a low priority; create a special status for closure so that it doesn&#8217;t hang around anywhere, not even at the bottom of the backlog. If you have a tail of tasks that are always there and visible to the team, remove them.<\/p>\n<p>If the priorities are valid, but there&#8217;s always a tail of tasks that never gets done, the team will again ignore the backlog. They&#8217;ll come to you with the question, &#171;What&#8217;s next?&#187; Even if there are only five tasks in the backlog, with two perpetually at the bottom and new ones always appearing at the top, they&#8217;ll still come to you because your backlog isn&#8217;t working.<\/p>\n<p>If you want a manageable team, keep the backlog clean. Train the team and lead by example to show that the backlog is a tool they can work with, trust in, and manage without your constant involvement. It&#8217;s much easier to maintain a clean backlog than to micromanage the team. Not only are you distracted, but so is the team. They won&#8217;t look beyond their current task because it&#8217;s unclear what else to consider.<\/p>\n<p>To address the concern, &#171;What if we suddenly need it? It&#8217;s an important task,&#187; remember that if your backlog is cluttered with unnecessary tasks, it will be ignored, and duplicates will be reported anyway. There&#8217;s no point in keeping such tasks. Keep them for yourself. Create a &#8216;Removed&#8217; status and make it possible to change it back to &#8216;New&#8217; if needed. This makes it psychologically easier. After a few months, review the statistics. You&#8217;ll realize that no tasks are ever reinstated. <\/p>\n<p>Even if something important does come up again, it will resurface with a new context and a fresh perspective.<\/p>\n<p>What if a developer reports something important to not forget? The same rule applies. If it&#8217;s being postponed, it goes to &#8216;Removed&#8217;. Explain that this doesn&#8217;t mean their input is disregarded (although, if you didn&#8217;t prioritize it, in a way, it is \u2013 be honest with yourself). Is it truly important? Review the task description; it&#8217;s likely that no one besides the reporter will understand what it&#8217;s about or why it&#8217;s needed. Imagine if they left the company. Who would take on the task? Probably no one. <\/p>\n<p>If a developer has an important idea or task they don&#8217;t want to forget, it&#8217;s better to handle it differently than just adding it to the backlog. Encourage the developer to keep their ideas in personal notes and to discuss them with you in one-on-one meetings. This approach is much more effective in making team members feel that their contributions are valued, rather than letting their suggestions languish at the bottom of the backlog.<\/p>\n<p>By engaging in direct discussions, you may gain deeper insights or better align the team, leading them to suggest more impactful and valuable ideas. Remember, one-on-one meetings have their own dynamics and benefits. If an idea isn&#8217;t immediately valuable, it doesn&#8217;t belong in the backlog, which should not be used as a dumping ground for every thought. The backlog is a strategic tool, meant to prioritize and organize tasks that are ready to be tackled and are of clear importance to the project&#8217;s current objectives.<\/p>\n<p>Keep your backlog clean, and your teams will thank you.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!----><!----><\/div>\n<p><!----><!----><br \/> \u0441\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u043e\u0440\u0438\u0433\u0438\u043d\u0430\u043b \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0438 <a href=\"https:\/\/habr.com\/ru\/articles\/794470\/\"> https:\/\/habr.com\/ru\/articles\/794470\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div><!--[--><!--]--><\/div>\n<div id=\"post-content-body\">\n<div>\n<div class=\"article-formatted-body article-formatted-body article-formatted-body_version-2\">\n<div xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/1999\/xhtml\">\n<figure class=\"full-width\"><\/figure>\n<p>When managing tasks, there&#8217;s a simple principle to follow: if a task keeps getting postponed and something else always takes priority, it might be time to accept this fact and remove it. There&#8217;s no need to keep it lingering in the backlog or to keep shifting it from one sprint to another. If this happens, teams will start losing faith in the backlog as a current and relevant tool. They&#8217;ll stop trusting the set priorities if they constantly change and will come to you asking for the next task to work on.<\/p>\n<p>Just delete it. Don&#8217;t assign it a low priority; create a special status for closure so that it doesn&#8217;t hang around anywhere, not even at the bottom of the backlog. If you have a tail of tasks that are always there and visible to the team, remove them.<\/p>\n<p>If the priorities are valid, but there&#8217;s always a tail of tasks that never gets done, the team will again ignore the backlog. They&#8217;ll come to you with the question, &#171;What&#8217;s next?&#187; Even if there are only five tasks in the backlog, with two perpetually at the bottom and new ones always appearing at the top, they&#8217;ll still come to you because your backlog isn&#8217;t working.<\/p>\n<p>If you want a manageable team, keep the backlog clean. Train the team and lead by example to show that the backlog is a tool they can work with, trust in, and manage without your constant involvement. It&#8217;s much easier to maintain a clean backlog than to micromanage the team. Not only are you distracted, but so is the team. They won&#8217;t look beyond their current task because it&#8217;s unclear what else to consider.<\/p>\n<p>To address the concern, &#171;What if we suddenly need it? It&#8217;s an important task,&#187; remember that if your backlog is cluttered with unnecessary tasks, it will be ignored, and duplicates will be reported anyway. There&#8217;s no point in keeping such tasks. Keep them for yourself. Create a &#8216;Removed&#8217; status and make it possible to change it back to &#8216;New&#8217; if needed. This makes it psychologically easier. After a few months, review the statistics. You&#8217;ll realize that no tasks are ever reinstated. <\/p>\n<p>Even if something important does come up again, it will resurface with a new context and a fresh perspective.<\/p>\n<p>What if a developer reports something important to not forget? The same rule applies. If it&#8217;s being postponed, it goes to &#8216;Removed&#8217;. Explain that this doesn&#8217;t mean their input is disregarded (although, if you didn&#8217;t prioritize it, in a way, it is \u2013 be honest with yourself). Is it truly important? Review the task description; it&#8217;s likely that no one besides the reporter will understand what it&#8217;s about or why it&#8217;s needed. Imagine if they left the company. Who would take on the task? Probably no one. <\/p>\n<p>If a developer has an important idea or task they don&#8217;t want to forget, it&#8217;s better to handle it differently than just adding it to the backlog. Encourage the developer to keep their ideas in personal notes and to discuss them with you in one-on-one meetings. This approach is much more effective in making team members feel that their contributions are valued, rather than letting their suggestions languish at the bottom of the backlog.<\/p>\n<p>By engaging in direct discussions, you may gain deeper insights or better align the team, leading them to suggest more impactful and valuable ideas. Remember, one-on-one meetings have their own dynamics and benefits. If an idea isn&#8217;t immediately valuable, it doesn&#8217;t belong in the backlog, which should not be used as a dumping ground for every thought. The backlog is a strategic tool, meant to prioritize and organize tasks that are ready to be tackled and are of clear importance to the project&#8217;s current objectives.<\/p>\n<p>Keep your backlog clean, and your teams will thank you.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><!----><!----><\/div>\n<p><!----><!----><br \/> \u0441\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u043e\u0440\u0438\u0433\u0438\u043d\u0430\u043b \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0438 <a href=\"https:\/\/habr.com\/ru\/articles\/794470\/\"> https:\/\/habr.com\/ru\/articles\/794470\/<\/a><br \/><\/br><\/br><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-368504","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=368504"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368504\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=368504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=368504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=368504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}