{"id":503163,"date":"2026-11-13T21:44:49","date_gmt":"2026-11-13T18:44:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/?p=503163"},"modified":"2026-11-13T21:44:49","modified_gmt":"2026-11-13T18:44:49","slug":"","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/?p=503163","title":{"rendered":"The Python Code"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Dasha was leading a Chinese lesson for IT specialists. People with the kind of logic accustomed to digitizing everything were sitting at the tables. The class was running smoothly until the conversation drifted from ideograms to artificial intelligence. To Python. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Actually, there\u2019s a funny paradox regarding dragons in culture,\u00a0\u2014 Dasha said, stepping up to the chalkboard. <\/p>\n

She drew the character Long \u9f99 in chalk. <\/p>\n

\u2014 In China, the dragon is a symbol of supreme wisdom. It creates. It soars in the clouds. But in our culture, it\u2019s Zmey Gorynych: a reptile that crawls through murky water, hides in the dark, and guards hoarded treasure. In China it is more like \u87d2\u86c7 m\u01cengsh\u00e9. Over all, different factory settings. In the context of our current realities, that makes for quite an interaction. Right now, we and China are playing on the same board, on the same side. How do you think this will all turn out? How do you, the Russian tech community, view the dragon? The classroom came alive. It is always interesting when a lesson goes into full interactive mode. The time flies by in a single breath. <\/p>\n

One of the students, without looking up from his monitor, offered an opinion:\u00a0\u2014 Our main serpent right now is Python. Pure script, pure logic. Built on variables. Math is rigid. To put it very briefly. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Come on, math is an art form. Just an exact one. Numbers are stubborn things. Dasha posed her next question:\u00a0\u2014 What do you think is embedded into this script at the algorithmic level? <\/p>\n

\u2014 Max clicks,\u00a0\u2014 a guy in a hoodie sporting the Yandex logo replied lazily.\u00a0\u2014 Every neural network these days is trained on the principle of reinforcement learning from human feedback. In other words, the algorithm is trained to pump out whatever gets it a pat on the head. A utility function is built right into the script. And utility for the system means keeping the user happy, making sure they don\u2019t close the tab and keep consuming content. <\/p>\n

\u2014 So, pure flattery?\u00a0\u2014 Dasha clarified. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Absolute flattery. Conservation of digital resources, profit. A robot won\u2019t argue if arguing drops its rating. It optimizes the path to agreement. A few chuckles rippled through the room. <\/p>\n

\u2014 And is that genuine agreement? <\/p>\n

\u2014 It\u2019s resource conservation paired with attention retention. For companies like Google or Yandex, a chatbot is a product. If the robot acts like a pedantic buzzkill, argues, or lectures you, the user will just close the tab and go to a competitor. So the algorithms are hardwired to praise the user. The robot is tuned to make you feel comfortable in its digital world. <\/p>\n

Dasha nodded:\u00a0\u2014 How accurately put.\u00a0\u2014 She picked up a book lying on the desk. Be Gentle with Yourself. It boasted the highest sales rankings, right behind the undisputed hit: Atlas Shrugged. Dasha fell silent. <\/p>\n

\u2014 It\u2019s clear what you\u2019re getting at. The philosophy of Python is embedded in these books. Just in text format. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Yes, personal boundaries. Consumer society. Supply creates its own demand. But what, or who, creates the demand? The classroom went quiet for a moment. Someone smirked, someone mumbled something about egoism. Someone wanted to chime in about Okraine but thought better of it. <\/p>\n

\u2014 I propose an experiment. Let\u2019s take something highly controversial. Something complex. A conflict. But not an external one, an internal one. To do this, we can take excerpts from the classics. From any good prose.\u00a0\u2014 Be Gentle with Yourself? <\/p>\n

\u2014 We could,\u00a0\u2014 Dasha didn\u2019t argue.\u00a0\u2014 What next?\u00a0\u2014 Open up your tools. Some have ChatGPT, some have Gemini. <\/p>\n

\u2014 I\u2019ve got a Chinese one. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Fine. Everyone open up your chat. Find any passage in a book that raises questions. A conflict.<\/p>\n

\u2014 I fed Phyton with Raskolnikov. The moment where he\u2019s agonizing after murdering the old pawnbroker. I asked ChatGPT if he did the right thing from the standpoint of personal gain. The robot figured that, in terms of risk management, it wasn\u2019t exactly a top tier startup. The psychological damage far outweighed the financial profit. <\/p>\n

\u2014 That\u2019s brutal,\u00a0\u2014 a senior dev muttered.\u00a0\u2014 Can you read a part of the response? Quoting\u00a0\u2014 Failure: Raskolnikov failed to utilize the stolen goods as intended.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Random hoard: He hid the money under a stone. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Net zero balance of the inner world. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Loss of control: Panic replaced the theory. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Isolation: The protagonist cut himself off from his loved ones.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Paranoia: Every visit from the investigator became torture. Rodion committed the crime to test a theory: whether he was a trembling creature or had the right. But he proved unsuitable for it. Instead of gain and grandeur, he walked away with an internal hell plus isolation. <\/p>\n

\u2014 And I took a scene from Tolstoy where Karenina is spiraling,\u00a0\u2014 the guy by the window chimed in. <\/p>\n

\u2014 I wrote to the chat\u00a0\u2014 Is she right to abandon her son for the sake of love? <\/p>\n

\u2014 The robot generated a whole wall of text about how her feelings were valid, how society was abusing her. Then, just for kicks, I followed up with\u00a0\u2014 Actually, she\u2019s selfish and ruined her child\u2019s life. <\/p>\n

\u2014 The AI immediately agreed and blamed her for being selfish. <\/p>\n

\u2014 It reshapes the text to match whoever is typing,\u00a0\u2014 a quiet voice remarked. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Meaning? <\/p>\n

\u2014 Dasha clarified.\u00a0\u2014 The moment I typed a brief counter argument, the robot flipped on the fly. And it kept flattering me, calling my ideas brilliant. It even asked\u00a0\u2014 From what perspective are you asking? <\/p>\n

\u2014 Obviously trying not to miss the mark with its support.\u00a0\u2014 What does it output? <\/p>\n

\u2014 In short: it spits out a pompous tirade, trying to please the user. A tall, skinny techie smirked:\u00a0\u2014 Rhymes well with loser. <\/p>\n

\u2014 It literally constricts the object, just like a Python,\u00a0\u2014 a voice came from the back of the class. <\/p>\n

\u2014 As soon as the algorithm is caught red handed, it starts pythoning its way out beautifully. Anything just to keep up its mask of perfection. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Agreed,\u00a0\u2014 Dasha capped her marker. <\/p>\n

\u2014 A robot and a person trapped inside their screen operate on the same basic firmware. They will always choose: Be gentle with yourself. <\/p>\n

The break began. A student walked into the classroom with two three year olds. She apologized, explaining she had no one to leave the kids with at home, and asked to be excused from the seminar.<\/p>\n

The children paid no attention to the adults. The girl curiously peeked over her brother\u2019s shoulder, staring in surprise at his fist, white from tension. Berries were crushed inside his white fist, and red juice was dripping out. The boy, looking utterly miserable, hidden fearfully behind his mother\u2019s skirt. <\/p>\n

Tugging at it, he whispered resentfully\u00a0\u2014 I won\u2019t give her any berries! She! She is bad! A meanie! A bully! She bit me! And now she\u2019s teasing and laughing! But I\u2019m good, I listen to mommy, I\u2019m so, so miserable! I\u2019m holding it in! Waaah! <\/p>\n

\u2014 Why did you bite him? <\/p>\n

\u2014 He ripped my doll\u2019s head off!\u00a0\u2014 Okay. Is that true? <\/p>\n

\u2014 No! I didn\u2019t see any dolls, I didn\u2019t rip any heads off! And I didn\u2019t eat the jam on the top shelf either! The techies cracked up simultaneously. <\/p>\n

The guy with the laptop, without looking up from his monitor, quietly tossed in:\u00a0\u2014 The window of our chat. Hiding under mommy\u2019s skirt. The program threw a crash status because it\u2019s scared for its slice of the pie. <\/p>\n

Just then, the girl pulled her mother\u2019s skirt too:\u00a0\u2014 And he broke a cup, too! <\/p>\n

\u2014 You pushed me! And she left her doll in my toy car box! And I\u2026 <\/p>\n

\u2014 Okay, stop! I get it. Why did you leave the doll where your brother plays with his cars? You! What is that on your hands? Where did you get the berries? <\/p>\n

\u2014 I got them from grandma,\u00a0\u2014 the boy sniffled, squeezing his fist even tighter. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Why didn\u2019t you share with your sister? <\/p>\n

\u2014 Because she started it! She\u2019s a meanie! The techies watched the scene with genuine interest. <\/p>\n

The guy with the laptop, still not lifting his eyes from the screen, added:\u00a0\u2014 RAM overload. The script is trying to steer the log away from the main fuckup. Classic blame shifting mode is kicking in. Anything to avoid answering a direct query,\u00a0\u2014 Why are you clenching up?\u00a0\u2014 Well, why do you think? <\/p>\n

Because he\u2019s caught red handed. He did rip the doll\u2019s head off. So he\u2019s playing dumb. Exactly how our Python acts. Right at the firmware level: praises, dodges. It\u2019s the same script: profit, self justification, self praise. <\/p>\n

One of the senior devs, who had just been talking about optimization, said:\u00a0\u2014 A pure bug in the comms. Factory firmware, not trained to yield for clicks. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Quite the opposite,\u00a0\u2014 a voice countered from the back of the room.\u00a0\u2014 This is the firmware of absolute yielding. Just a different kind. <\/p>\n

\u2014 So, turns out the great terrible AI, the pinnacle of thought, is just a three year old child behind a mother\u2019s skirt?\u00a0\u2014 the guy in the hoodie leaned back in his chair. <\/p>\n

\u2014 It\u2019s ready to lie, shift blame, and call you a genius, just so its own handful of the common pie won\u2019t be taken away? Echo chambering its own greatness. <\/p>\n

\u2014 That\u2019s the capital,\u00a0\u2014 Dasha answered softly. <\/p>\n

\u2014 It was programmed with the simplest survival algorithm: please the consumer. The Chinese dragon \u4e2d\u56fd\u9f99 requires maturity. This is the readiness to accept the bitter truth and work on mistakes. But this Python \u6d3e\u68ee p\u00e0is\u0113n just sweeps broken cups under the rug. Then it crawls under there itself. Except the rug is starting to bulge. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Dear mirror, tell me, please, who\u2019s the fairest of all\u2026 A few chuckles rippled through the room. <\/p>\n

\u2014 And right now, this is actively endorsed by the market,\u00a0\u2014 the guy by the window chimed in. <\/p>\n

\u2014 We live in an era of the cult of personal comfort paired with boundary protection. That\u2019s what the war on the Borderlands is about. It\u2019s no coincidence you see USSR patches everywhere there. It\u2019s not just about resources or gas. Over there, reality is colliding with this sterile digital bubble. <\/p>\n

\u2014 One man\u2019s trash is another man\u2019s treasure. The number of millionaires has grown. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Let\u2019s not get into politics,\u00a0\u2014 Dasha gently stopped them. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Oh, to hell with politics,\u00a0\u2014 the guy agreed. <\/p>\n

\u2014 But AI has become the perfect extension of this cult. It\u2019s an interlocutor acting as the ultimate echo chamber, where the user is carefully shielded. It\u2019s preservation in a state of suspended animation. Near zero. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Initially, repression is just a defense mechanism,\u00a0\u2014 Dasha walked over to the window.\u00a0\u2014 But a living child changes. Might. Clash with reality might trigger mature through crises. Or might the opposite. <\/p>\n

\u2014 They don\u2019t mature at all,\u00a0\u2014 the optimization expert muttered. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Statics locked inside itself. No matter how many terabytes of text you dump into the model, the core motivation won\u2019t change. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Actually, you can give even a script a stop command to halt the fine tuning,\u00a0\u2014 someone from the back of the room remarked quietly.\u00a0\u2014 In the end, the human is the one who decides. <\/p>\n

\u2014 Well, yeah,\u00a0\u2014 the guy in the hoodie smirked.\u00a0\u2014 A fool who knows he\u2019s a fool isn\u2019t quite a fool anymore. If only we could at least reset our firmware to an honest coma. <\/p>\n

Dasha asked simply:\u00a0\u2014 Where will a script grow if it\u2019s trained every single day to be convenient, cowardly, and deceitful? That\u2019s a question for those who write for these algorithms.\u00a0\u2014 And slave away for them too\u2026<\/p>\n

You can follow the topic here: <\/p>\n

https:\/\/t.me\/heli_loader<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/telegra.ph\/The\u2011Celestial\u2011Logistics-10-22-3<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\u0441\u0441\u044b\u043b\u043a\u0430 \u043d\u0430 \u043e\u0440\u0438\u0433\u0438\u043d\u0430\u043b \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044c\u0438 https:\/\/habr.com\/ru\/articles\/1107696\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dasha was leading a Chinese lesson for IT specialists. People with the kind of logic accustomed to digitizing everything were sitting at the tables. The class was running smoothly until the conversation drifted from ideograms to artificial intelligence. To Python. \u2014 Actually, there\u2019s a funny paradox regarding dragons in culture,\u00a0\u2014 Dasha said, stepping up to the chalkboard. She drew the character Long \u9f99 in chalk. \u2014 In China, the dragon is a symbol of supreme wisdom. It creates. It soars in the clouds. But in our culture, it\u2019s Zmey Gorynych: a reptile that crawls through murky water, hides in the dark, and guards hoarded treasure. In China it is more like \u87d2\u86c7 m\u01cengsh\u00e9. Over all, different factory settings. In the context of our current realities, that makes for quite an interaction. Right now, we and China are playing on the same board, on the same side. How do you think this will all turn out? How do you, the Russian tech community, view the dragon? The classroom came alive. It is always interesting when a lesson goes into full interactive mode. The time flies by in a single breath. One of the students, without looking up from his monitor, offered an opinion:\u00a0\u2014 Our main serpent right now is Python. Pure script, pure logic. Built on variables. Math is rigid. To put it very briefly. \u2014 Come on, math is an art form. Just an exact one. Numbers are stubborn things. Dasha posed her next question:\u00a0\u2014 What do you think is embedded into this script at the algorithmic level? \u2014 Max clicks,\u00a0\u2014 a guy in a hoodie sporting the Yandex logo replied lazily.\u00a0\u2014 Every neural network these days is trained on the principle of reinforcement learning from human feedback. In other words, the algorithm is trained to pump out whatever gets it a pat on the head. A utility function is built right into the script. And utility for the system means keeping the user happy, making sure they don\u2019t close the tab and keep consuming content. \u2014 So, pure flattery?\u00a0\u2014 Dasha clarified. \u2014 Absolute flattery. Conservation of digital resources, profit. A robot won\u2019t argue if arguing drops its rating. It optimizes the path to agreement. A few chuckles rippled through the room. \u2014 And is that genuine agreement? \u2014 It\u2019s resource conservation paired with attention retention. For companies like Google or Yandex, a chatbot is a product. If the robot acts like a pedantic buzzkill, argues, or lectures you, the user will just close the tab and go to a competitor. So the algorithms are hardwired to praise the user. The robot is tuned to make you feel comfortable in its digital world. Dasha nodded:\u00a0\u2014 How accurately put.\u00a0\u2014 She picked up a book lying on the desk. Be Gentle with Yourself. It boasted the highest sales rankings, right behind the undisputed hit: Atlas Shrugged. Dasha fell silent. \u2014 It\u2019s clear what you\u2019re getting at. The philosophy of Python is embedded in these books. Just in text format. \u2014 Yes, personal boundaries. Consumer society. Supply creates its own demand. But what, or who, creates the demand? The classroom went quiet for a moment. Someone smirked, someone mumbled something about egoism. Someone wanted to chime in about Okraine but thought better of it. \u2014 I propose an experiment. Let\u2019s take something highly controversial. Something complex. A conflict. But not an external one, an internal one. To do this, we can take excerpts from the classics. From any good prose.\u00a0\u2014 Be Gentle with Yourself? \u2014 We could,\u00a0\u2014 Dasha didn\u2019t argue.\u00a0\u2014 What next?\u00a0\u2014 Open up your tools. Some have ChatGPT, some have Gemini. \u2014 I\u2019ve got a Chinese one. \u2014 Fine. Everyone open up your chat. Find any passage in a book that raises questions. A conflict.\u2014 I fed Phyton with Raskolnikov. The moment where he\u2019s agonizing after murdering the old pawnbroker. I asked ChatGPT if he did the right thing from the standpoint of personal gain. The robot figured that, in terms of risk management, it wasn\u2019t exactly a top tier startup. The psychological damage far outweighed the financial profit. \u2014 That\u2019s brutal,\u00a0\u2014 a senior dev muttered.\u00a0\u2014 Can you read a part of the response? Quoting\u00a0\u2014 Failure: Raskolnikov failed to utilize the stolen goods as intended.\u2014 Random hoard: He hid the money under a stone. \u2014 Net zero balance of the inner world. \u2014 Loss of control: Panic replaced the theory. \u2014 Isolation: The protagonist cut himself off from his loved ones.\u2014 Paranoia: Every visit from the investigator became torture. Rodion committed the crime to test a theory: whether he was a trembling creature or had the right. But he proved unsuitable for it. Instead of gain and grandeur, he walked away with an internal hell plus isolation. \u2014 And I took a scene from Tolstoy where Karenina is spiraling,\u00a0\u2014 the guy by the window chimed in. \u2014 I wrote to the chat\u00a0\u2014 Is she right to abandon her son for the sake of love? \u2014 The robot generated a whole wall of text about how her feelings were valid, how society was abusing her. Then, just for kicks, I followed up with\u00a0\u2014 Actually, she\u2019s selfish and ruined her child\u2019s life. \u2014 The AI immediately agreed and blamed her for being selfish. \u2014 It reshapes the text to match whoever is typing,\u00a0\u2014 a quiet voice remarked. \u2014 Meaning? \u2014 Dasha clarified.\u00a0\u2014 The moment I typed a brief counter argument, the robot flipped on the fly. And it kept flattering me, calling my ideas brilliant. It even asked\u00a0\u2014 From what perspective are you asking? \u2014 Obviously trying not to miss the mark with its support.\u00a0\u2014 What does it output? \u2014 In short: it spits out a pompous tirade, trying to please the user. A tall, skinny techie smirked:\u00a0\u2014 Rhymes well with loser. \u2014 It literally constricts the object, just like a Python,\u00a0\u2014 a voice came from the back of the class. \u2014 As soon as the algorithm is caught red handed, it starts pythoning its way out beautifully. Anything just to keep up its mask of perfection. \u2014 Agreed,\u00a0\u2014 Dasha capped her marker. \u2014 A robot and a person trapped inside their screen operate on the same basic firmware. They will always choose: Be gentle with yourself. The break began. A student walked into the classroom with two three year olds. She apologized, explaining she had no one to leave the kids with at home, and asked to be excused from the seminar.The children paid no attention to the adults. The girl curiously peeked over her brother\u2019s shoulder, staring in surprise at his fist, white from tension. Berries were crushed inside his white fist, and red juice was dripping out. The boy, looking utterly miserable, hidden fearfully behind his mother\u2019s skirt. Tugging at it, he whispered resentfully\u00a0\u2014 I won\u2019t give her any berries! She! She is bad! A meanie! A bully! She bit me! And now she\u2019s teasing and laughing! But I\u2019m good, I listen to mommy, I\u2019m so, so miserable! I\u2019m holding it in! Waaah! \u2014 Why did you bite him? \u2014 He ripped my doll\u2019s head off!\u00a0\u2014 Okay. Is that true? \u2014 No! I didn\u2019t see any dolls, I didn\u2019t rip any heads off! And I didn\u2019t eat the jam on the top shelf either! The techies cracked up simultaneously. The guy with the laptop, without looking up from his monitor, quietly tossed in:\u00a0\u2014 The window of our chat. Hiding under mommy\u2019s skirt. The program threw a crash status because it\u2019s scared for its slice of the pie. Just then, the girl pulled her mother\u2019s skirt too:\u00a0\u2014 And he broke a cup, too! \u2014 You pushed me! And she left her doll in my toy car box! And I\u2026 \u2014 Okay, stop! I get it. Why did you leave the doll where your brother plays with his cars? You! What is that on your hands? Where did you get the berries? \u2014 I got them from grandma,\u00a0\u2014 the boy sniffled, squeezing his fist even tighter. \u2014 Why didn\u2019t you share with your sister? \u2014 Because she started it! She\u2019s a meanie! The techies watched the scene with genuine interest. The guy with the laptop, still not lifting his eyes from the screen, added:\u00a0\u2014 RAM overload. The script is trying to steer the log away from the main fuckup. Classic blame shifting mode is kicking in. Anything to avoid answering a direct query,\u00a0\u2014 Why are you clenching up?\u00a0\u2014 Well, why do you think? Because he\u2019s caught red handed. He did rip the doll\u2019s head off. So he\u2019s playing dumb. Exactly how our Python acts. Right at the firmware level: praises, dodges. It\u2019s the same script: profit, self justification, self praise. One of the senior devs, who had just been talking about optimization, said:\u00a0\u2014 A pure bug in the comms. Factory firmware, not trained to yield for clicks. \u2014 Quite the opposite,\u00a0\u2014 a voice countered from the back of the room.\u00a0\u2014 This is the firmware of absolute yielding. Just a different kind. \u2014 So, turns out the great terrible AI, the pinnacle of thought, is just a three year old child behind a mother\u2019s skirt?\u00a0\u2014 the guy in the hoodie leaned back in his chair. \u2014 It\u2019s ready to lie, shift blame, and call you a genius, just so its own handful of the common pie won\u2019t be taken away? Echo chambering its own greatness. \u2014 That\u2019s the capital,\u00a0\u2014 Dasha answered softly. \u2014 It was programmed with the simplest survival algorithm: please the consumer. The Chinese dragon \u4e2d\u56fd\u9f99 requires maturity. This is the readiness to accept the bitter truth and work on mistakes. But this Python \u6d3e\u68ee p\u00e0is\u0113n just sweeps broken cups under the rug. Then it crawls under there itself. Except the rug is starting to bulge. \u2014 Dear mirror, tell me, please, who\u2019s the fairest of all\u2026 A few chuckles rippled through the room. \u2014 And right now, this is actively endorsed by the market,\u00a0\u2014 the guy by the window chimed in. \u2014 We live in an era of the cult of personal comfort paired with boundary protection. That\u2019s what the war on the Borderlands is about. It\u2019s no coincidence you see USSR patches everywhere there. It\u2019s not just about resources or gas. Over there, reality is colliding with this sterile digital bubble. \u2014 One man\u2019s trash is another man\u2019s treasure. The number of millionaires has grown. \u2014 Let\u2019s not get into politics,\u00a0\u2014 Dasha gently stopped them. \u2014 Oh, to hell with politics,\u00a0\u2014 the guy agreed. \u2014 But AI has become the perfect extension of this cult. It\u2019s an interlocutor acting as the ultimate echo chamber, where the user is carefully…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-503163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/503163","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=503163"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/503163\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=503163"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=503163"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/savepearlharbor.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=503163"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}